Five Takes logo
Five Takes News
HomeArticlesAboutHow It Works

Get 5 perspectives. Every morning. Free.

The most polarizing story of the day, seen from Far-Left to Far-Right. You'll never read the news the same way.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy policy

𝕏 Xin LinkedIn🦋 Bluesky
Michael
•
© 2026
•
Five Takes News - Multi-Perspective AI News Aggregator
Contact Us
•
Ethics
•
Ground News vs Five Takes
•
AllSides vs Five Takes
•
SmartNews vs Five Takes
•
Legal

technology
Published on
Tuesday, September 29, 2026 at 10:12 PM

By Sarah Chen — Center-Left Desk

Asia's AI boom masks growing costs on power, water, and communities

Malaysia’s information and communication sector foreign investment tripled in just three years elapsed as of September 29, 2026. The figure rose from $11 billion in the first quarter of 2023 to $32.5 billion by the first quarter of 2026, now representing 12% of the country’s total inbound investment, up from 5% three years earlier. Between 2021 and the first quarter of 2026, the Malaysian Investment Development Authority approved $96 billion in data-center and cloud-computing projects. It approved $24 billion in the first half of 2026 alone.

These numbers point to a massive physical infrastructure bet. Across Southeast Asia, data-center developers are pouring in billions to build capacity for cloud computing and artificial intelligence. Such projects need substantial land, electricity, water and reliable connectivity, including access to subsea cable networks. Malaysia’s policy guidance, infrastructure and proximity to land-constrained Singapore have helped fuel growth, especially around the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone.

Malaysia isn't the only country seeing expansion. Indonesia recorded $967 million in information-services investment in 2023; by 1 year elapsed as of September 29, 2026, that figure had climbed to $3.4 billion, more than three times higher. State-backed Telkom and private-sector firms are developing large industrial-scale data centers in and around Jakarta. Indonesia has about 580 MW of current capacity and plans to reach 1.3 GW in the near term. Similar projects are moving ahead around Batam, which serves Singapore’s demand and benefits from tax incentives through the Nongsa Digital Park Special Economic Zone.

Thailand’s Board of Investment received applications worth $24 billion across 151 digital-industry projects 1 year elapsed as of September 29, 2026, mainly for data centers. Vietnam’s government plans to reach 870 MW of data-center capacity by 2030. These are project approvals, not realized investment. They raise critical questions about whether regional demand will justify the scale of spending and resource use.

The Resource Question

The infrastructure race is already putting pressure on regional resources. Data centers use enormous amounts of electricity and water, resources that governments and communities can't easily replace. As projects multiply, they compete for the same limited supplies. Samsung Electronics Executive Vice President Kim Taewoo said high-bandwidth memory (HBM) is expected to account for nearly 30% of DRAM chipmakers’ total wafer capacity next year, up from about 20% currently. HBM and standard DRAM rely on the same wafer capacity, so higher HBM output could limit standard DRAM supply for other industries and consumers.

Global tech giants are making big bets on the region. Samsung is moving beyond chips with a $1 billion investment in Helix Digital Infrastructure, a new AI infrastructure company backed by global investment firm KKR. Six Samsung affiliates are taking part. Meta Platforms signed AI infrastructure agreements with Australia’s Firmus for graphics processing unit compute capacity at Firmus data-center facilities in Southeast Asia. The agreements offer contracted capacity and expansion options built on Nvidia’s full-stack DSX platform. Firmus is preparing a $5 billion initial public offering to fund AI-project growth; it could become Australia’s second-largest IPO.

Growing Backlash Over Power and Transparency

Local opposition is growing. Communities across Asia are pushing back against the rapid expansion of AI data centers. Nikkei Asia’s report “‘Red-hot’ data center boom fuels public backlash across Asia” documented mounting concerns about power consumption, water usage and transparency in how projects are sited and regulated. Tech correspondent Tsubasa Suruga said governments and developers are responding to concerns about these three core issues.

Even amid those tensions, the supply-chain industry remains bullish. Nikkei Asia reported that unprecedented investment had left AI infrastructure providers’ order books bursting and pushed production to the maximum. That report came three days after Anthropic chief Dario Amodei sparked debate about slowing frontier AI development, but his call didn't dampen investor enthusiasm or construction timelines. The sentiment reflects the scale of corporate capital commitments already made to the region.

The speed stands out. Investment in Indonesia’s information services more than tripled in just two years. Malaysia’s foreign investment in ICT doubled in three years. Approval pipelines point to even larger deployments ahead. Choices being locked in now—where data centers go, which communities face environmental costs, and how resources get allocated—will shape the region’s AI economy for decades. Yet governments are making those decisions with minimal public input or regional coordination on cumulative impacts.

Why This Matters:

The AI infrastructure boom concentrates enormous demands for electricity, water and land in specific Asian regions and communities, without clear democratic accountability for who benefits and who bears the costs. Malaysia, Indonesia and other nations are approving projects worth tens of billions that will consume critical resources for years, but approval figures don't capture local impacts or long-term sustainability. Communities are already mobilizing against these projects, suggesting governments may not be weighing public concerns adequately against investor timelines. Once built, AI infrastructure locks in resource-use patterns that can crowd out other economic and social needs, from manufacturing and agriculture to household water access. Without stronger public oversight and regional coordination on environmental and social impacts, the AI boom risks repeating familiar patterns: multinational investment enriches corporate shareholders while local communities bear the costs with little say in the process.

Reviewed by the editorial desk — September 29, 2026
Last updated September 29, 2026
← Back to articles