Five Takes logo
Five Takes News
HomeArticlesAboutHow It Works

Get 5 perspectives. Every morning. Free.

The most polarizing story of the day, seen from Far-Left to Far-Right. You'll never read the news the same way.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy policy

𝕏 Xin LinkedIn🦋 Bluesky
Michael
•
© 2026
•
Five Takes News - Multi-Perspective AI News Aggregator
Contact Us
•
Ethics
•
Ground News vs Five Takes
•
AllSides vs Five Takes
•
SmartNews vs Five Takes
•
Legal

news
Published on
Wednesday, July 1, 2026 at 10:09 AM

By Zoe Rivera — Anarchist Desk

Trump Allies Push to Strip Birthright Citizenship

Trump ally Sen. Bernie Moreno said Tuesday he’d introduce legislation that would limit birthright citizenship and pressure Democrats to support it, even after the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s order attempting to do so. The machinery of power didn’t stop at the courthouse door. It just shifted back to Congress, where lawmakers are now being asked to turn a constitutional right into a bargaining chip.

Trump posted, “Congress should start TODAY to work on ending expensive and unfair to our Country, Birthright Citizenship.” That’s the language of the ruling class trying to decide who gets to belong and who gets pushed out. The target here isn’t some abstract legal theory. It’s people at the bottom, the ones who’d bear the cost if the state redraws the line around citizenship to suit the bosses’ politics.

Who Has the Power

Moreno said he’d introduce legislation and cited a similar 1993 bill from the late former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. The reference matters because the same institutions keep recycling the same controls, dressing them up as fresh debate while the state keeps its grip on people’s lives. Several other similar measures have been introduced this Congress in the House and Senate, showing how quickly the apparatus moves when it wants to narrow rights instead of expanding them.

Speaker Mike Johnson said, “Well, we’re looking at that,” and added, “I think the court made the wrong decision.” He also warned that reversing birthright citizenship “may require a constitutional amendment,” and “as you know, that is a large undertaking.” That’s the polite language of a system that knows exactly how much power it’s trying to concentrate. Two-thirds of both chambers of Congress and ratification of three-fourths of states would be required. The bar is high, but the intent is plain: use every lever available to make exclusion look procedural.

Who Pays for the Game

The people who pay aren’t the ones making the speeches. They’re the ones whose status, families, and futures get turned into a political weapon while elected officials posture for cameras and donors. Trump and his allies rallied for lawmakers to take up legislation ending birthright citizenship in the U.S. after the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s order. The court blocked one route. The politicians are already lining up another.

That’s the trap built into reform politics. One branch of the state checks another, then the same project comes back wearing a different suit. The public gets told this is deliberation. It’s really a contest over which part of the hierarchy gets to decide who counts.

What They’re Calling “Debate”

The push came as Trump and his allies rallied for lawmakers to take up legislation ending birthright citizenship in the U.S. after the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s order attempting to do so. The sequence is blunt. First the order. Then the court. Then the legislative push. No pause, no humility, just another round of institutional pressure aimed at the same result.

Moreno’s plan to pressure Democrats shows how the fight is being staged inside the same closed arena. The public is told to wait for Congress, wait for the courts, wait for the states, as if the people most affected are supposed to sit quietly while powerful men negotiate over their lives. Meanwhile, the state keeps offering the same old promise: accept our process, and maybe we’ll decide your rights for you later.

Trump’s demand that Congress act “TODAY” says plenty about the tempo of domination. Fast when it serves power. Slow when ordinary people need relief. The whole thing reads like a test of how far the political class can push before the language of citizenship itself becomes just another tool of exclusion.

Reviewed by the editorial desk — July 1, 2026
Last updated July 1, 2026

Previous Article

Confidence Rises as Labor Market Slips

Next Article

Trump’s Dallas Rally Machine Targets Congress
← Back to articles