
Labor Partnership Accelerates Critical Infrastructure
America's building trades unions have become essential partners in the nation's race for artificial intelligence dominance, mobilizing hundreds of thousands of skilled workers to construct the massive data center infrastructure that underpins the emerging AI economy. The alignment represents a pragmatic convergence of interests: unions gain unprecedented membership growth and job security, while tech giants secure the specialized labor required for multibillion-dollar projects at scale.
North America's Building Trades Unions hit a record number of members and apprentices 1 year ago, a surge directly attributable to data center construction demand. The growth mirrors the building trades' expansion in the 1950s and reflects the combined impact of data center projects, power plant construction, and legislation under former President Joe Biden that subsidized semiconductor factories, electric vehicle battery plants, and grid transmission improvements.
The economic scale is substantial. Dorsey Hager, a top official, estimated that data centers consume at least 40% of work hours done by members of the Columbus-Central Ohio Building and Construction Trades Council. In metropolitan Washington, D.C., data centers account for at least 50% of the work hours done by members of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 26. These figures underscore how concentrated the economic opportunity has become within the construction labor market.
Membership Surge and Training Expansion
Unions across multiple states are reporting skyrocketing man hours, with apprentice classes doubling in size and training centers undergoing expansions to meet anticipated demand. The Boilermakers Local 154 in southwestern Pennsylvania—a region that has watched power plants shut down—went from recruiting zero apprentices for four years to assembling a class of over 200, with union official Shawn Steffee noting that more are needed.
Tech giants are investing directly in this workforce development. Sam Altman, co-founder and CEO of OpenAI, stated 2 months ago in a joint statement with McGarvey's organization that "across the country, highly skilled union construction workers are laying the foundation for the AI economy." Google has committed a $10 million grant to a union-backed electricians training program designed to expand the electrician workforce pipeline by 70%.
Mark McManus, the general president of the United Association of Union Plumbers and Pipefitters, emphasized the market reality of union participation. His union has negotiated labor agreements on major projects, including an Oracle and OpenAI Stargate campus in Michigan and the "Project Blue" data center campus in Arizona. McManus stated that based on an internal survey, his union has members working on over 90% of the data center projects in the United States. "That's a market share that we don't have in a lot of other industries," he said.
Political Alignment and Community Engagement
The unions have become visible advocates for data center development in communities and legislatures, often aligning with traditional Republican pro-business constituencies and forcing Democrats to navigate conflicting priorities. When Gov. Josh Shapiro announced that Amazon would spend $20 billion on two data center projects in eastern Pennsylvania in 2026, Rob Bair, president of the Pennsylvania Building and Construction Trades Council, stood alongside the executives.
In statehouses, unions have actively opposed restrictions on data center development. They worked against Maine's since-vetoed proposal for a statewide data center moratorium, standards proposed in Illinois including requirements that data centers supply their own energy, and efforts to end Virginia's sales tax exemption that made it the world's biggest data center destination. Pennsylvania state Sen. Katie Muth acknowledged the political difficulty of advancing data center regulations when they compete with union-backed legislation that she views as weaker.
Unions have aggressively addressed community concerns that tech companies often leave unaddressed. Rob Bair stated, "When people say, you know, 'data centers are the root of all evil,' we're just saying, 'look, they do create a hell of a lot of construction jobs, which we live and work in your communities.'" He advised communities to negotiate directly with tech companies for improvements and funding, saying, "If you don't ask, you're never gonna get."
Union representatives have made their presence felt at municipal meetings from St. Louis to Spring City, Pennsylvania. In Hobart, Indiana, at a January 2026 meeting on an Amazon data center, Chuck Curry, the president of Ironworkers Local 395, told City Council members, "I just want to commend you guys, thanks for being the adults in the room. Knowing the tax structure, knowing business, that most of the people here don't know."
An Associated General Contractors of America survey late last year suggested that the labor composition of data center construction likely mirrors the makeup of commercial construction, which is roughly one-third union.
Why This Matters:
The union-tech partnership in data center construction represents a significant economic realignment with implications for labor markets, fiscal policy, and America's competitive position. The concentration of work in data center projects—ranging from 40% to 90% of union work hours in specific regions—creates both opportunity and risk. Rapid membership growth and training expansion indicate market-driven demand responding to genuine infrastructure needs, yet the dependency on a single sector raises questions about long-term diversification and wage sustainability. From a center-right perspective, this development demonstrates how market forces can align private sector interests with workforce development without requiring extensive government intervention, though the reliance on Biden-era subsidies suggests the underlying demand may partially reflect policy-driven rather than purely organic market conditions. The political dynamics—with unions opposing restrictions and forcing Democrats to choose between labor and environmental constituencies—illustrate how fiscal and regulatory policy shapes coalition politics and community outcomes.