
A Florida jury has convicted four men of conspiracy in the 2021 assassination of Haitian President Jovenel Moïse, a plot that U.S. prosecutors confirm was planned and financed from South Florida. The verdict exposes the direct role of foreign actors in orchestrating the removal of a national leader, leading to what the base article describes as “extraordinary turmoil in Haiti” and a systematic undermining of the nation's self-determination.
Arcangel Pretel Ortiz, Antonio Intriago, Walter Veintemilla, and James Solages were found guilty of conspiring to kill or kidnap Haiti’s elected leader and providing material support for the plot. These convictions highlight how external interests can directly interfere with the governance of sovereign nations, dictating leadership from abroad.
The men were also convicted of violating the U.S. Neutrality Act, facing possible life sentences for their involvement in a scheme that sought to replace a sitting president with a conspirators’ chosen candidate. This legal outcome underscores the transnational nature of the plot, which crossed national borders to destabilize a sovereign state.
U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Jason Reding Quiñones, stated that the defendants “pursued power, influence, and profit through violence,” and “supported a conspiracy that crossed borders, destabilized a friendly nation, and ended with the murder of a sitting president.” This official statement confirms the elite-driven, profit-motivated nature of the intervention.
Foreign Hands in National Leadership
Prosecutors argued that the convicted men aimed to enrich themselves with a new government, having their own leader in mind for Haiti. This reveals a clear elite-collaboration angle, where financial gain and influence superseded national sovereignty and the democratic process of the Haitian people.
President Moïse was killed on July 7, 2021, when approximately two dozen foreign mercenaries, primarily from Colombia, attacked his home near Port-au-Prince. The presence of foreign combatants executing a political assassination illustrates the direct military component of this transnational operation.
Martine Moïse, the president’s wife, was wounded during the attack and testified in Miami’s federal court, recounting her husband’s last words: “Honey, we are dead.” Her testimony, delivered through a Creole interpreter, brought the human cost of this foreign-orchestrated destabilization into sharp focus.
Ortiz and Intriago were principals of Counter Terrorist Unit Federal Academy and Counter Terrorist Unit Security (CTU), while Veintemilla was a principal of Worldwide Capital Lending Group. Both companies were based in South Florida, demonstrating the corporate infrastructure used to facilitate the plot against a sovereign nation.
Christian Sanon, a dual Haitian-American citizen, was initially favored by the conspirators to replace Moïse, according to investigators. Solages, a CTU representative in Haiti, coordinated with Sanon and others, further illustrating the dual loyalties and foreign influence at play in the attempted leadership change.
The Cost of External Intervention
Defense attorneys for the convicted men argued that their clients believed they possessed a legitimate warrant signed by a Haitian judge and were acting to liberate Haiti from Moïse, who they claimed had overstayed his term. This perspective, while presented by the defense, suggests a narrative of internal resistance that was potentially manipulated by external forces.
At least five other individuals have already pleaded guilty in the conspiracy and are currently serving life sentences, indicating the breadth of the network involved in the assassination. Separately, 20 people, including 17 Colombian soldiers, face charges in Haiti, further confirming the extensive foreign involvement.
The ongoing investigation in Haiti has been stalled by gang violence, death threats, and a crumbling judicial system. This systemic breakdown is a direct consequence of the “extraordinary turmoil” unleashed by the assassination, demonstrating the profound and lasting impact of foreign intervention on national stability and the rule of law for the native population.
The trial in Miami’s federal court began in March of the same year, bringing to light the intricate details of a plot that sought to impose a new leadership on Haiti through violence and external manipulation. The convictions serve as a stark reminder of the vulnerability of national sovereignty to transnational elite interests seeking power and profit.