The European Commission wants EU governments to name the authorities responsible for preparing people for climate disasters, but it doesn’t expect to provide more funding for household adaptation. That’s the plan as Brussels warns that Europe must prepare for a world 3°C warmer by 2100.
Climate Action Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra said the proposed rules would require governments to identify who holds responsibility, while leaving them to decide whether it sits at national, regional or local level. The Commission says clear assignments could prevent disputes after floods or wildfires destroy homes. But naming an authority isn’t the same as giving households money to protect themselves.
Responsibility, without a household fund
Hoekstra said the world was heading toward a temporary or potentially prolonged overshoot of the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C warming limit. Even if emissions-cutting efforts succeed, readiness and resilience must become priorities, he said. “It is up to member states to decide where they want to put that responsibility. But what we do make mandatory is that they do have to appoint and articulate where the responsibility is going to lie,” he said.
The Commission’s reference trajectory projects 2°C of global warming by 2050 and 3°C by 2100 for Europe. Its projections draw on research including work by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and advanced European climate modelling. Europe is warming roughly twice as fast as the global average, the Commission says, and national and local risk assessments need to account for uneven impacts.
Hoekstra said the rules would also require authorities to consider climate scenarios when planning roads, bridges and neighbourhoods. Infrastructure designed around past weather, the Commission argues, may no longer be suitable. Speaking anonymously on Monday, a senior Commission official said the aim was “a culture of preparedness and resilience by design, rather than dealing with the damages in the aftermath, which is often very ad hoc and doesn’t always build back better.”
The damage already carries a high cost. Hoekstra estimated that this summer’s extreme weather caused more than €100 billion in economic damage. “Even if we get all of this right, we have no way to avoid more summers than the one we saw last year,” he said.
Budgets decide who can adapt
The Commission doesn’t expect its climate resilience strategy to bring a new financial commitment for household adaptation support, despite concerns that people may struggle to afford necessary improvements. Hoekstra pointed to a Commission proposal to allocate 35% of the EU budget to climate and nature. That’s a proposed allocation, not a household support scheme; he didn’t announce such a scheme or explain how lower-income households would pay for upgrades.
The strategy’s effectiveness will partly depend on negotiations over the next multiannual EU budget, where climate spending competes with defence, security, competitiveness and agricultural support. The Commission is also relying on €30 billion recently announced by the European Investment Bank for climate adaptation through 2030. The article says the absence of new funding could weaken the plans. Hoekstra argued that preventive investment was economically worthwhile, but who can afford it remains unanswered.
Brussels also plans to work with the insurance sector on Europe’s climate protection gap. Hoekstra said many areas were underinsured against climate disasters. A senior Commission official said only around 25% of assets exposed to climate impacts were insured, leaving governments and property owners vulnerable to substantial losses. “The fact that so many areas are underinsured” was one issue the Commission would examine, Hoekstra said.
So the Commission is assigning responsibility, urging resilience and pointing to existing budget proposals and investment. Its own account leaves a blunt gap: households may need costly improvements, yet Brussels hasn’t announced new household adaptation support.
- european commission
- wopke hoekstra
- climate adaptation
- climate resilience
- extreme weather
- paris agreement
- european investment bank