Five Takes logo
Five Takes News
HomeArticlesAbout

Get the 5 Takes Daily in your inbox →

The most polarizing story of the day, seen from 5 political perspectives. Every morning.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy policy

Michael
•
© 2026
•
Five Takes News - Multi-Perspective AI News Aggregator
Contact Us
•
Legal

science
Published on
Thursday, June 18, 2026 at 02:08 PM
EU Elites Push Foreign Energy Corridors, Costing Nations Billions

European nations face a deepening energy crisis, yet the European Union is actively pursuing vast, multi-national infrastructure projects that divert billions in resources and further integrate the bloc into a globalist energy framework. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen confirmed this week that “other routes will be built,” specifically citing the India-Middle-East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), even as the EU spent an additional 25 billion euros on oil and gas imports in the first 54 days of the Iran war. This push for “strategic autonomy” through supranational projects comes as individual member states grapple with the economic fallout of global conflicts and rising energy costs.

The Supranational Agenda

President von der Leyen told G7 leaders at this week’s summit that “alternative export routes have been created that are more resilient and offer choices” and that “other routes will be built — for example, a typical one is IMEC.” This corridor is presented as a means to offer the European Union greater economic resilience, supply-chain diversification, and energy security, bolstering the bloc’s strategic autonomy. The EU has supported IMEC through a memorandum of understanding, despite only a handful of its 27 member states being formal signatories. A high-ranking EU diplomat, speaking anonymously, stated that “The focus now is on translating that vision into practical implementation across its three pillars: transport and trade connectivity, energy connectivity and digital connectivity,” which could involve new pipelines and transmission cables.

Costs to European Nations

The financial burden of this globalist agenda is already evident. President von der Leyen reported that the EU spent 25 billion euros, or $29 billion, more on oil and gas imports in the first 54 days of the Iran war and faces the risk of a longer-term jet fuel shortage. Instead of prioritizing national energy independence, the bloc’s leadership, including European Council President Antonio Costa, declared during an EU leaders’ meeting in April that the EU is “ready to team up with Gulf countries” to establish new energy infrastructure. This strategy redirects European capital and focus towards foreign ventures, such as encouraging European companies to invest in renewable energy projects in the Gulf to supply the EU’s energy demand, as stated by an anonymous EU official. French Foreign Ministry spokesperson Pascal Confavreux noted that G7 leaders are discussing financing and building infrastructure, “sometimes on the terrestrial part, that will be able to go outside of the track of the Strait of Hormuz,” further illustrating the transnational focus.

The Globalist Mechanism

IMEC, a key component of this post-national energy vision, would pass through Israel and has Israeli support. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last year called it “a very revolutionary and transformative development.” Lianne Pollak-David, co-founder of the Israel-based Coalition for Regional Security, highlighted that U.S. leadership would be crucial for IMEC’s advancement, particularly in normalizing relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia, which she described as an “essential player.” Another project, the Great Seas Interconnector (GSI), an EU-backed electricity cable, is envisioned to connect continental Europe with EU member Cyprus and eventually Israel, stretching 1,208 kilometers. This project, while bogged down in financing red tape, is seen by Gallia Lindenstrauss, senior fellow with the Israel-based Institute for National Security Studies, as a “very pragmatic solution for the modern energy needs” that paves the way for “green energies,” fitting the EU’s broader environmental agenda. Gabriel Mitchell, an analyst with the German Marshall Fund think tank, confirmed that any new projects would need to fit the EU’s green policies, meaning pipelines would likely be built with future dual-use capabilities for transporting both gas and possibly hydrogen. U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright, who inaugurated the Eastern Mediterranean Energy Center last week, underscored the U.S. role in fostering closer energy ties among Greece, Cyprus, and Israel, viewing the Eastern Mediterranean as “an increasingly important region for global energy development.” These interconnected initiatives demonstrate a concerted effort by international institutions and elite interests to establish a new energy order that bypasses national control and traditional supply routes.

Previous Article

NATO Review Stalled: Information Blockade on US Forces

Next Article

Globalist Scams Target Fans, FIFA Profits from High Prices
← Back to articles