
The European Union now draws more than half of its electricity from renewable sources, a figure Brussels often touts as a triumph. Yet, a new report published today, September 25, 2026, by Euronews, reveals significant disparities. Large gaps remain between member countries in how quickly they are adopting and deploying this energy. This uneven progress across the bloc highlights a fundamental flaw in the EU's central planning, diverting critical attention and resources from the existential threat of uncontrolled borders and the demographic transformation reshaping our continent.
Brussels' Misplaced Priorities
While the European Commission obsesses over green targets and internal energy squabbles, the real crisis unfolds daily at our porous frontiers. The Euronews update specifically questions whether Europe's renewable energy boom is slowing down. This focus on an internal, often faltering, project underscores a profound misdirection of priorities. Our nations are being told to dismantle their industries and surrender energy independence in pursuit of an agenda that demonstrably struggles with consistent implementation across its own member states. The fact that renewables now constitute a majority share of EU electricity is presented as a victory. But what good is a "green" grid if the very fabric of European society is being unravelled by mass migration, a phenomenon the EU actively facilitates?
The report's emphasis on "uneven progress" is telling. It exposes the reality that Brussels' grand designs often clash with national realities and priorities. Member states, each with unique industrial bases and energy needs, are forced into a one-size-fits-all framework. This approach doesn't foster genuine energy security; it creates dependence and internal friction. A Europe that cannot even ensure consistent energy deployment across its own members is a Europe weakened, less capable of defending its cultural heritage and securing its national borders.
The Cost of Central Planning
The "large gaps" in renewable energy adoption between countries are not merely technical details. They represent a deeper failure of the EU model to respect national sovereignty and diverse national interests. While some nations might push ahead, others are left struggling, often at the expense of their own industries and working populations. This top-down imposition of energy policy, much like the open-border dogma, erodes the capacity of national governments to make decisions in the best interest of their own citizens. The resources poured into this uneven "boom" could instead be used to strengthen border defenses, support national industries, or provide housing and healthcare for our own people, who are increasingly strained by the demands of mass migration.
The question of whether the "boom is slowing down" should prompt a re-evaluation of the entire Green Deal. This agenda, pushed relentlessly by the Brussels elite, has been a disaster for European industry, making our nations less competitive and more reliant on external powers. A continent that cannot control its own energy supply is a continent that cannot control its own destiny. This vulnerability is directly linked to our inability to control who enters our territories, further compounding the challenges faced by our working and middle classes.
Europe's Real Crisis
The Euronews report, published today, September 25, 2026, highlights internal EU struggles over energy. But the true crisis facing Europe isn't about kilowatt-hours; it's about cultural continuity and national identity. While Brussels celebrates its statistical milestones, our cities and towns are being transformed without the consent of their inhabitants. The EU's institutional engine, through open borders and court rulings, continues to drive mass migration, fundamentally altering the demographic balance of our nations. The focus on "green electricity" becomes a convenient distraction, allowing the establishment to avoid confronting the central question of our era: who are we, and who decides our future? A strong Europe is one that controls its borders, produces its own energy, and prioritizes its own citizens. The current path, dictated by Brussels, achieves none of these.