The Trump administration revoked the visa of a Chinese national working for state news agency Xinhua in the United States, marking a reciprocal response after Beijing expelled Vivian Wang, a China correspondent for The New York Times. A person familiar with the matter confirmed the visa had been revoked, and a State Department official confirmed there was a plan to revoke the visa.
The move followed Beijing's expulsion of Wang, apparently over the appearance of the Taiwanese leader in a DealBook event in which Wang had no role. The timing is particularly notable given it came days after President Donald Trump's mid-May summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing, where Xi warned that China and the U.S. could "collide or even clash" over Taiwan if the issue is not handled properly.
The Taiwan Question
Beijing moved to expel Wang, who had been a China correspondent for the newspaper since 2020, after the media group's DealBook Summit 2025 featured Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te in a recorded interview with host Andrew Ross Sorkin. Sorkin called Taiwan a country, and Lai warned of Beijing's aggressive behavior in the Taiwan Strait and vowed that "Taiwan will do everything necessary to protect itself."
The Chinese government claims sovereignty over Taiwan, which split from the mainland in 1949 after Mao Zedong's communists won a civil war. All foreign journalists must be accredited by China's foreign ministry to report in China, and Beijing has used the accreditation and visa policy to expel or keep out foreign journalists whose work has upset the Chinese leadership or to show displeasure with what Beijing views as unfavorable or malicious coverage of China.
Declining Press Freedom
Wang is leaving China when the presence of U.S. media is already thin after previous rounds of disputes over journalistic credentials, leaving several U.S. news organizations with skeleton staffing in their China bureaus. Joseph Kahn, the paper's executive editor, said in a statement published on the Times' corporate website, "The Chinese government's decision to expel Vivian Wang is wrong," and added, "Her expulsion will make it even harder for our global audience to get accurate, independent and in-depth reporting about the world's second largest economy at a critical time."
Kahn wrote that "The number of correspondents from American media outlets allowed to work in China has now fallen to an alarmingly low level, at a time when the need for people everywhere to understand China is greater than ever." The New York Times said it does not ask governments to revoke media credentials or otherwise interfere with the work of any journalist. On Friday, the paper called for Wang to be reinstated as a credentialed journalist in China and urged both governments to reverse what it called a deterioration in journalist access.
History of Retaliation
Six years ago, the Chinese government expelled three Wall Street Journal correspondents after the newspaper ran an opinion piece titled "China is the Real Sick Man of Asia" following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. As U.S.-China relations soured, the U.S. State Department six years ago designated some major Chinese news groups as "foreign missions." Xinhua, for example, is tasked by the ruling Chinese Communist Party to serve as the mouthpiece of the party and the government, which includes distributing their official news.
Beijing in turn drastically limited visas for journalists working for U.S. media. In total, at least 18 foreign journalists working for The Washington Post, The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal were expelled in the first half of six years ago, according to the Foreign Correspondents' Club of China. Many others were given short visas ranging from one month to three months, according to the group's annual survey. The two governments later reached a one-time agreement that allowed U.S. media to send in a small number of correspondents to mainland China. Wang was one of them.
The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Why This Matters:
The reciprocal expulsions underscore the fragility of U.S.-China relations and Beijing's willingness to use media access as a tool of state control and diplomatic leverage. The designation of Chinese state media as "foreign missions" six years ago correctly recognized entities like Xinhua as instruments of Chinese Communist Party propaganda rather than independent news organizations. Beijing's response—drastically limiting American journalists' ability to report from the world's second-largest economy—creates information asymmetry that disadvantages American businesses, policymakers, and citizens who need accurate intelligence about Chinese markets, government actions, and geopolitical intentions. The timing, coming days after the Trump-Xi summit where Taiwan tensions were explicitly discussed, demonstrates how Beijing conflates independent journalism with diplomatic disputes, treating reporters as pawns in broader strategic competition. This pattern threatens American national security interests by limiting on-the-ground intelligence gathering in a critical rival nation.