Five Takes logo
Five Takes News
HomeArticlesAbout

Get the 5 Takes Daily in your inbox →

The most polarizing story of the day, seen from 5 political perspectives. Every morning.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy policy

Michael
•
© 2026
•
Five Takes News - Multi-Perspective AI News Aggregator
Contact Us
•
Legal

news
Published on
Monday, May 25, 2026 at 11:10 AM
Liberal Gun Ban Consolidates State Power, Disarms Public

A new gun ban signed by Democratic Gov. Abigail Spanberger last week moves to disarm the populace by prohibiting the future sale and manufacture of many semiautomatic rifles, pistols, shotguns, and magazines with a capacity of more than 15 rounds. This action has prompted immediate resistance from local prosecutors who argue the measure undermines the community's ability to defend itself against state overreach.

Ryan Mehaffey, a Marine veteran and commonwealth attorney for Spotsylvania County, has taken a hard-line stance, refusing to enforce the ban. Mehaffey sent a letter to Spotsylvania Sheriff Roger Harris, instructing him that the ban is unconstitutional and cannot be lawfully enforced. The bill is set to take effect this July, ahead of America’s 250th anniversary of independence.

The State's Monopoly on Force

Gov. Spanberger's office released a statement calling the assault weapons ban a "critical step toward protecting families, communities, and the law enforcement officers who serve them." Spanberger stated she signed the bill because "firearms designed to inflict maximum casualties do not belong on our streets." She also noted that while the General Assembly did not adopt her amendment to specifically carve out certain firearms used for hunting, she intends to work with patrons to "clarify this language." This attempt at a symbolic concession highlights the liberal approach to managing contradictions without addressing the fundamental question of the state's increasing monopoly on force.

Mehaffey, in an interview with Fox News Digital, countered that the law "is striking at the core of the militia system that existed in Virginia." He asserted that the Second Amendment is not merely an assurance of personal freedoms but "a safeguard for a community’s ability to defend itself through a well-regulated militia." Mehaffey emphasized that the founders "were careful to make sure when they drafted our founding document, that the ultimate right of the people was preserved to defend themselves and to defend their community." He added that the "linchpin of the constitutional analysis is going to be does this instrument have some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a regulated militia."

Defense of the People's Arms

Mehaffey further argued that Virginia's historical tradition and legal precedent necessitate citizens owning firearms for public defense. He stated that while the Second Amendment "may not mean that you are allowed to have a nuclear weapon, but what it does allow you to have is a basic infantry weapon." Drawing a parallel to the Founding Fathers’ time, when the standard issue was a musket and 20 rounds, Mehaffey pointed out that today's basic infantry weapon in the U.S. military is the M4A1 carbine, equipped with a 30-round magazine. He concluded that "That sort of weapon is the core of what's protected by the Second Amendment. Not necessarily a nuclear warhead, but a rifle that you can take out and form either a fire team or a company to defend yourself and to defend your community." This perspective frames the right to bear arms as essential for collective self-defense against potential state aggression or other threats, rather than solely individual sport or hunting.

Resistance to Disarmament

Mehaffey is not alone in his refusal to enforce the state's new directive. Phillip Blevins, an Air Force veteran and Commonwealth’s Attorney for Smyth County, has also refused to enforce the bill, arguing its unconstitutionality. Blevins told Fox News Digital that "ultimately, courts will continue to address these issues, and I respect the role of the judiciary. But as the elected Commonwealth’s Attorney for Smyth County, I will continue to stand for what I believe the Constitution requires, without apology or hesitation." He clarified that his position "is not based on politics. It is based on constitutional fidelity," adding, "The Bill of Rights either means something, or it does not." Blevins reiterated his oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of Virginia," stating that this oath "is not situational, and it does not change based on politics, headlines, or pressure from either side of an issue."

Mehaffey reported an "overwhelmingly positive response" from his community regarding his stance. The ban is also facing legal challenges from several gun-rights groups, including the NRA, Firearms Policy Coalition, and Second Amendment Foundation. Mehaffey expressed confidence that those resisting the ban "will ultimately prevail," asserting that "The Second Amendment is the supreme law of the land, both in the U.S. Constitution and the analog in the Virginia Constitution," and therefore, "whatever law is passed by the General Assembly is not going to have the ability to supersede the Constitution." He concluded by stating his commitment to "be a good servant to the people that elected me to represent them and to stick up for their rights," expecting other government officials to "remain faithful to the Constitution and to discharge their duties as servants of the people."

Previous Article

Rwanda Deploys DNA Tech: Detection, Not Systemic Solution

Next Article

Capital Gains as US-Iran 'Peace' Serves Imperial Ambitions
← Back to articles